Amber Heard request to have Johnny Depp’s verdict set aside is rejected by a judge

FALLS CHURCH – Amber Heard attempt to appeal the judgment against her in favor of ex-husband Johnny Depp has been rejected by a federal judge in Virginia.

Depp won a high-profile case against Heard last month, claiming that the actress falsely accused her of having misled the jury in her defamation case. Heard was successful in a smaller, $2 million judgment against him. Heard won a judgment that was smaller, but still worth $2 million, in a defamation suit that she brought against johnny Depp.

amber Heard filed a motion earlier this month seeking to have Depp’s verdict overturned or a mistrial declared. Her lawyers cited multiple factors, including the possible identification of the wrong juror. She cited multiple factors, including the possible fact that one of the jurors was not as informed as he said he was. In a written order, Judge Penney Azcarate rejected Heard’s claims. She also said that the question of who would be on the jury panel was irrelevant and that Heard couldn’t show that she had any prejudice.

The juror was vetted, sat for the whole jury, deliberated, and reached a verdict. This Court is bound by what the jurors decide. This is the only evidence that is before the Court that the juror and all other jurors had the same experiences as the judge — they all agreed on their oaths, that the judge gave them the instructions that they should have given them and that they agreed with those instructions. It is up to the jury to decide matters competently, wrote Judge Azcarate.

Depp sued in Fairfax County for $50 million after Amber Heard wrote an op-ed piece in the Washington Post about domestic violence, in which she described herself as an advocate for victims of domestic abuse. He did not even say the name of any of his clients, but his lawyers said several passages in the article defamed him by implication by referring to highly publicized abuse allegations that his client made in 2016 when she filed for divorce. She then filed a $100 million counterclaim against Depp, also alleging defamation. Depp also sued Heard, claiming that the woman’s claims that she had been abused by him were a hoax.

amber Heard won $15 million in her suit against Depp and $2 million in his suit against him. It was reduced from $15 million to $10.35 million after a judge ruled that there was a $350,000 cap on punitive damages. Judge Michael S. O’Hara did not offer a rationale for rejecting other claims that Heard made.

amber Heard argued that the $10 million verdict was not supported by the facts, and that the jury failed to focus on the fallout from the op-ed piece that they were supposed to do, and instead just looked at the reputational damage that Depp suffered as a result of the alleged abuse. Heard’s lawyers also said that the verdicts for both Depp and Heard were absurd.

It is inconsistent and impossible for judges to reach a unanimous decision in favor of one of these men, but her lawyers, Elaine Bredehoft and Benjamin Rottenborn, argued that the jury’s verdicts were inconsistent and unconscionable

Also Read: Amber Heard Net Worth 2022, Real Name, Age, Height, Relationship, Child, Divorce?

Heard lawyers say the wrong Juror was seated in the Courtroom

amber Heard lawyers also challenged the verdict saying that one of the jurors who decided the case was never given a jury summons to serve as a member of the jury. According to court papers, a 77-year-old man received a summons to serve on a jury; his son, who lives at the same address as the judge, accepted the summons and served in its place. But his son, who also has the same name and lives at the same address, answered his jury summons and acted in his stead.

amber Heard lawyers said that Virginia is very strict about juror identities, and that any jury could be misled if a juror is not who he says he is. They did not show that the 52-year-old son, identified in court documents only as Juror #15, purposely or insidiously sought to succeed his father, but they argue that that possibility should not be discounted.

The Court cannot assume, as Mr. Depp wants it to, that Juror 15’s apparently improper service was an innocent mistake. It could have been an intentional attempt to serve in a high-profile case, Heard’s lawyers wrote. It could have been a deliberate effort to serve on a high-profile case, which would have been a highly publicized case.

Heard is able to appeal the decision to the Virginia Court of Appeals. The issues that could be presented to the court on appeal may be different from those that were rejected by Judge Azcarate. The appeals court could decide entirely different issues than what Judge Azcarate ruled on Wednesday.

In a separate order, a judge ordered that dozens of court documents be declassified, including motions to have Depp and Heard have independent medical exams. A few of those documents will remain sealed, but most of the information that they contain is private and not public. Some documents will be kept sealed, because they contain sensitive information, like contact details or medical records.

In this matter, the litigants tried to sue one another and were then subject to the public forum of a jury trial. Court records are public information, Dixon wrote. Court records are public information, and anyone can see them by clicking on the link below.

cscdigitalsolutions.com

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *